From owning to orchestrating expertise
In the past, large knowledge-focused organizations acquired, developed, and retained expertise almost entirely in-house. They built deep hierarchical pyramids of permanent employees, juniors feeding work upward to seniors, because high-quality external knowledge was expensive to access, geographically constrained, and difficult to switch on and off. This model was the only practical way to ensure quality, speed, confidentiality, and continuity.
Today that legacy model is breaking, irreversibly and faster than many realize. Merely fifteen years ago, tapping the world’s best expert for a three-week project sounded like science fiction. Ten years ago, it became possible for a few pioneering firms. Today it is all over, and it is no longer only about human experts. Three consecutive technology waves have demolished the economic and practical barriers that once justified keeping expertise inside:
The traditional organizational pyramid, historically being the norm, is now increasingly obsolete and will eventually impossible to sustain. When the world’s best specialists can be booked for three weeks or three hours at the click of a button, when a distributed team in six time zones delivers higher quality than the team sitting together in the conference next to you, and when an AI-model produces in ninety seconds what used to occupy a six-person junior team for a month, the economic rationale for maintaining broad, permanent junior and middle layers collapses. Headcount that once signaled capability now increasingly signals inertia. The fixed costs, long recruitment cycles, location-dependent salaries and cultural baggage that come with full-time employees are turning from assets into liabilities when comparable or superior outcomes can be achieved with a fraction of the commitment and risk.
The traditional organizational pyramid is not merely shrinking at the edges; its foundational logic—that you must own the expertise required in your business—is being invalidated in real time. Functions that justified entire departments (market intelligence, financial modeling, competitive benchmarking, even substantial parts of strategy and R&D) are migrating to on-demand external platforms, leaving internal hierarchies simultaneously over-staffed and under-specialized. Within a few years, carrying a large, generalist knowledge-work payroll will feel like running your own electricity plant the day after the grid reached your town: technically possible, nostalgically charming, and financially indefensible. Organizations that continue to measure status, readiness, and prestige by the size of their permanent pyramid will find themselves outmaneuvered by leaner competitors who treat expertise as a variable utility rather than a fixed monument. The shift is no longer a future threat; it is an unfolding reality that many executive teams still discuss in the polite language of “experimentation” while their cost structure becomes structurally unsustainable.
The emerging model is no longer an organizational pyramid, it is a network of concentric circles orbiting a dramatically smaller, re-specialized core. At the centre sits a thin, permanent nucleus of true differentiators: the handful of capabilities that define competitive advantage and cannot be safely externalized – typically the firm’s unique data moats, proprietary algorithms, mission-critical IP, long-term client relationships, and the leadership team that sets vision and allocates capital. This core is deliberately kept small (often 20% or less of today’s knowledge-work headcount) and extraordinarily high-calibre; its members are paid at the top decile, given real equity, and measured on outcomes that move the share price or the mission, not on hours logged or juniors managed.
Everything else is orchestrated, not owned. Immediately around the core lies a fluid ring of committed partners and long-term freelancers, often former “employees” who now operate as micro-firms or independent specialists, retained on rolling contracts or multi-year framework agreements. They provide continuity without the fixed-cost burden of employment. Trust is maintained through shared history, watertight contracts, and reputation systems far more powerful than any HR policy.
Beyond them extends an on-demand halo of global experts, boutique firms, and AI services activated only when needed. For example, a complex M&A due-diligence project might pull in a former investment-banking MD for four weeks, a data-science collective in Eastern Europe for six, and three different frontier LLMs for specific modeling tasks, all coordinated in real time by a small, core team that only grows with increasing networking requirements. When the project ends, expertise cost drops back to near zero; no bench, no severance, no mandatory training budgets.
The entire structure is held together by three new organizational muscles that barely existed a decade ago. Consequent work modularization, through which every process is broken into clearly scoped, priced, and hand-off-ready modules so that external talent can plug in seamlessly. A world-class orchestration layer, consisting of program managers, prompt engineers, and “integrators” whose power and capability is turning heterogeneous inputs (human + AI + remote) into coherent, on-brand output faster than any traditional department ever could. And dynamic capital allocation, with budgets moving quarterly or even weekly toward whatever combination of core, partner, and spot-market resources are delivering the highest ROI, unconstrained by last year’s org chart or this year’s salary bill.
This is not downsizing disguised as strategy. In fact, companies are becoming smaller and bigger at the same time as they focus on the core networking and orchestrating capabilities while tapping into global expertise on a much larger scale. It is a complete redefinition of what an “organization” even is: from a fixed collection of people to a real-time system for assembling the world’s best resources around a problem, then dissolving them when the problem is solved. The winners will be the firms that treat expertise like cloud computing, infinitely scalable, pay-as-you-go, always on the latest version, and that rebuild their operating model accordingly before the market rebuilds it for them.
At 10EQS we have been living this reality for over a decade, and we see clients deliberately build their workforce strategy around it: keep the core lean and irreplaceable, route everything else to the global brain plus AI. The paradigm has already shifted. The question left is how quickly you shift with it.
Get in touch with us and we will get back to you immediately.
10EQS needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, please review our Privacy Policy.
%2C%20Color%3DNegative.svg){kind=small}
